Legal Opinion

Dye v. Council of the City of Compton

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1947No. Civ. 15498PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

On January 23, 1946, petitioners and appellants, Stanley C. Dye and William H. Jenner, as “residents, qualified electors, and taxpayers of the City of Compton” commenced the instant proceedings in mandamus directed against the council of the city of Compton and its respective members (specifically named as parties respondent in the petition) to compel that legislative body either to (1) entirely repeal sections 62 and 98-E of Ordinance No. 595, or (2) submit the same to a vote of the qualified electors of the city of Compton under the referendum law; or to show cause why they had…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Dwyer v. City Council of the City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Ex Parte BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Ley v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Chase v. KalberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Collins v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Hunt v. Mayor & Council of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Reagan v. City of SausalitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Midway Orchards v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. County of Kern v. T.C.E.F., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API