Legal Opinion
Quetgles v. City of Columbus
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 15, 1997No. S97A1136PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thompson, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant City of Columbus in this adult entertainment case. At issue is City of Columbus Ordinance No. 96-21, which regulates adult entertainment businesses by, inter alia, prohibiting private modeling sessions between customers and employees and requiring the businesses to meet certain distance requirements from other establishments such as churches and schools. Plaintiffs claim the ordinance is unsupported by evidence of negative secondary effects and is a prior restraint on free speech. Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Paramount Pictures Corp. v. BusbeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Goldrush II v. City of MariettaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Bo Fancy Productions, Inc. v. Rabun County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Gravely v. BaconSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- S. J. T., Inc. v. Richmond CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- For Your Eyes Alone, Inc. v. City of Columbus, Ga.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Chambers v. Peach County, Ga.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Magnum Towing & Recovery, LLC v. City of ToledoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- For Your Eyes Alone v. City of Columbus, Ga.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2001
- Robert Pennza, Inc. v. CITY OF COLUMBUS, GA.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.