For Your Eyes Alone v. City of Columbus, Ga.
District Court, M.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
LAWSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ renewed motion for summary judgment (Tab # 30). For the reasons stated herein, the Court ABSTAINS from considering Plaintiffs’ objections to Section 14-228 of the Columbus Adult Entertainment Code, and the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiffs’ void-for-vagueness challenges to Section 14-227 of the Columbus Adult Entertainment Code.
A. Facts
There are four Plaintiffs in this case. Four Your Eyes Alone, Inc. (“FYEA”) owns and operates a lingerie modeling studio in Columbus, Georgia. The other three plaintiffs…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Colonial First Properties, LLC v. Henrico County VirginiaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001