Legal Opinion
Robert Pennza, Inc. v. CITY OF COLUMBUS, GA.
District Court, M.D. Georgia
Decided February 27, 2002No. 4:00-cv-00069PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAND, District Judge.
This case arises from yet another constitutional challenge to Columbus, Georgia’s attempt to regulate adult entertainment. 1 Plaintiffs operated an establishment known as “Secrets” which featured the presentation of erotic dialogue by female performers intended to communicate non-obscene messages of eroticism and ecstacy from the performers to their customers. Plaintiffs had operated their establishment with valid licenses and permits for an “erotic conversation establishment” since May 1998. In March 1999, Plaintiffs timely renewed their erotic conversation license…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Beatrice S. Wood and Sandra Surburg Ritter, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Orange County and Kenneth KienthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- BEECHWOOD RESTORATIVE CARE CENTER v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007