Legal Opinion
Goldrush II v. City of Marietta
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 17, 1997No. S96A1494, S96A1496 and S96A1497PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Benham, Chief Justice.
Appellants are establishments which provide adult entertainment and are located within the City of Marietta. For several years, each establishment has applied for and received annual licenses issued by the city authorizing the businesses to provide adult entertainment and to serve alcoholic beverages.1 In January 1995, acting pursuant to the authority granted by a 1994 amendment to the Georgia Constitution, the Marietta City Council passed an amendment to the city’s adult entertainment ordinance which amendment provided that a liquor license would not be issued for a…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Deal v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Pap's A.M. v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Bandoni v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- TROP, INC. Et Al. v. CITY OF BROOKHAVEN Et Al.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2014
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.