Legal Opinion

Houston & North Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Local No. 745, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided April 21, 1939No. 54 CivPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District Judge.

On a date prior to March 7th, the court allowed the Dallas Transfer & Terminal Warehouse Company to intervene. The cause had been instituted by the North Texas Motor Freight Lines, against certain labor organizations and certain individual respondents.

Later, after due notice, testimony and argument was heard on the question of whether a temporary restraining order should be granted. Complying with the statute, with reference to those matters, restraints were granted as to certain respondents, individually. There was no restraining order as against any labor union. On…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. United Mine WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  2. Cantlay & Tanzola, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  3. Jamaica Lodge 2188 v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1961
  4. Cantlay & Tanzola v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  5. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Lumber & Sawmill WorkersOregon Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API