Legal Opinion
Cantlay & Tanzola v. United States
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 24, 1953No. 15166PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
115 F.Supp. 72 (1953)
CANTLAY & TANZOLA, Inc. et al.
v.
UNITED STATES et al.
No. 15166.
United States District Court, S. D. California, C. D.
September 24, 1953.
Edward M. Berol, Bertram S. Silver and Marvin Handler, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs Cantley & Tanzola, Inc., and others.
Stevenson & Richman, Los Angeles, Cal., for International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers,American Federation of Labor, Local Unions Nos. 104, 310, and 224.
Marvin Handler, San Francisco, Cal., for intervening plaintiffs Whitfield Transportation, Inc. and E. B. Law and Son, Inc.
Frederick…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1962
- Railroad Commission v. Oil Field Haulers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Consolidated Truck Service, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1960
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1962
- Pacific Inland Tariff Bureau v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.