Legal Opinion
Cantlay & Tanzola, Inc. v. United States
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 24, 1953No. 15166PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
Certain tank-truck motor carriers of bulk petroleum products, joined by various locals of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehouse-men and Helpers, seek by this action to enjoin and annul an order of the In*75terstate Commerce Commission entered January 12, 1953 in proceeding entitled. “Investigation and Suspension Docket No. 6010 — Petroleum, Los Angeles and El Paso to Arizona and New Mexico.” See 287 I.C.C. 731 (1953).
Jurisdiction of this court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1336. See also: Id. §§ 2321-2325, 2284; 49 U.S.C.A. § 17 (9); 5 U.S.C.A. §…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1956
- Dixie Carriers, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1956
- Irvin v. HobbyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1955
- Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.