Nice v. Priday
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendants Priday (defendants) appeal a judgment granting a prescriptive easement through their property and awarding damages for interference with that easement. We reverse.
Personal representatives for the Estate of Mary Folmsbee (the estate) hold title to a 160-acre tract known as the Ward Creek property. In June 1993, plaintiffs entered into an earnest money agreement with the estate to purchase the property. The only automobile access to the Ward Creek property is through a ranch owned by defendants Priday. Defendants Priday disputed plaintiffs’ and the estate’s access through their ranch…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- House v. HagerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Office Services Corp. of America v. CAS Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Westwood Corp., Developers & Contractors v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Read v. DokeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hoffman v. Freeman Land and Timber, LLC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Algermissen v. SutinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- R & C. RANCH, LLC v. KundeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Webb v. ClodfelterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Meier v. RiegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.