Legal Opinion

Meier v. Rieger

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 4, 1998No. 95-0808, CA A93808PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

In this action to quiet title to real property, the parties dispute ownership of a sliver of land on the border between their two parcels. Plaintiff contends that she and her predecessors enclosed the disputed land with a fence and treated it as their own for a sufficient period of time to have acquired it by adverse possession. Defendants contend that they were aware of the fence and gave permission — albeit not explicitly — to plaintiff and her predecessors to use the land and that, as a result, plaintiff cannot claim acquisition by adverse possession. In the alternative, defendants contend…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Feldman Et Ux. v. Knapp Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Coos County v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. House v. HagerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Dawson v. Oklahoma City Casket CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Freeman Land and Timber, LLC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Mid-Valley Resources, Inc. v. EngelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Hoffman v. Freeman Land and Timber, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API