Legal Opinion
Algermissen v. Sutin
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 12, 2002No. 27,186PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Justice.
{1} Plaintiffs appeal from a district court order, following a bench trial, which dismissed with prejudice their claims to a public easement by prescription. The district court determined that Plaintiffs failed to prove the elements of a prescriptive easement by clear and convincing evidence. Plaintiffs appealed initially to the Court of Appeals, which in turn certified the matter to this Court. (See NMSA 1978, § 34-5-14(c) (1972); Rule 12-606 NMRA 2002. We affirm.
I
{2} This case revolves around a neighborhood dispute in the north valley area of Albuquerque. Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hester v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Schlieter v. CarlosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Sanchez v. Dale Bellamah Homes of New Mexico, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. WilliamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Sosa v. Empire Roofing Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- City of Des Plaines v. RedellaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Trask v. NoziskoColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- McKenzie County v. ReichmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Ulibarri v. JesionowskiNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2022
- Kaywal, Inc. v. Avangrid Renewables, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.