Legal Opinion

State v. Phillips

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1975No. 7415SC991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

In order to preserve all objections on appeal, both defendants have assigned error to the wording of the indictments, the denial of their motions for nonsuit, and the court’s instructions to the jury. We have examined the record and conclude that these assignments are without merit.

The indictments clearly negate the idea that defendants took their own property and therefore are sufficient as to owner ship. See State v. Ballard, 280 N.C. 479, 186 S.E. 2d 372 (1972) ; State v. Mason, 279 N.C. 435, 183 S.E. 2d 661 (1971) ; State v. Fountain, 14 N.C. App. 82, 187 S.E. 2d 493 (1972).…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clifford v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. KinardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  3. Clifford v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. AkubaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. AkubaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API