Apache Playtime, Inc. v. Universal Playtime, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Appellants claim that the trial court improperly denied them a jury trial. We agree and therefore reverse.
Appellants-plaintiffs filed their original complaint on January 21, 1974, asserting against appellees-defendants five specific claims for relief, three pertaining to appellant Apache Playtime and two pertaining to appellant Mies. The complaint as to both appellants sought damages for fraud in that the appellees allegedly misrepresented the profits and gross sales of the respective businesses when they were sold to the appellants. Appellants alternatively sought…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Trixler Brokerage Company, a California Corporation v. Ralston Purina Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Leigh v. SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Hackin v. Pioneer Plumbing Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Evans v. LundgrenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Lanza v. Drexel & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
3Cited by2 opinions
- Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985