Legal Opinion
Lanza v. Drexel & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 23, 1967No. 64 Civ. 3557PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZNER, District Judge.
Defendant Kircher has moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 38(b) for an order to transfer this case from the nonjury to the jury calendar. Plaintiffs have submitted an affidavit in support of defendant Kircher’s motion, and defendants Drexel & Co., John Ames Ballard, Bertram D. Coleman and Jack Friedman have submitted papers in opposition.
This suit is brought under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Pleadings with respect to the original complaint were closed March 24, 1965. No timely jury demand was filed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. M. Patricia BreslinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Reeves v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
- Ridge Theatre Corp. v. United Artists Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- New Hampshire Fire Insurance v. PerkinsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1961
- Southern Equipment Co. v. ChristensenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hackin v. Pioneer Plumbing Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Apache Playtime, Inc. v. Universal Playtime, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976