Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Pete Novak applied to the respondent Commission to fix the amount of his compensation growing out of an injury received. A hearing was had and the Commission made an award in favor of the claimant in the sum of $131.39 against the Fireman’s Fund Indemnity Company, but dismissed the application as against the employer. The indemnity company has applied to this court for a writ of review.
In the early part of August, 1931, Pete Novak started to Boulder Dam to seek employment. He stopped at Lassco and temporarily took employment under Worden & Forsythe as a laborer in constructing a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Makins v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Hackley-Phelps-Bonnell Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Dominguez v. PendolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Argonaut Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Mitchell v. Ed HizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Hinkle v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- v. GalvanColorado Court of Appeals · 2019