Legal Opinion

Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1932No. Docket No. 8435PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Pete Novak applied to the respondent Commission to fix the amount of his compensation growing out of an injury received. A hearing was had and the Commission made an award in favor of the claimant in the sum of $131.39 against the Fireman’s Fund Indemnity Company, but dismissed the application as against the employer. The indemnity company has applied to this court for a writ of review.

In the early part of August, 1931, Pete Novak started to Boulder Dam to seek employment. He stopped at Lassco and temporarily took employment under Worden & Forsythe as a laborer in constructing a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Makins v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Hackley-Phelps-Bonnell Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  4. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Dominguez v. PendolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Argonaut Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Mitchell v. Ed HizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Hinkle v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. v. GalvanColorado Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API