Legal Opinion
Borden v. Sinskey
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 19, 1976No. Nos. 75-1256, 75-1274PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, William S. Borden, trustee in reorganization of Corpamerica, Inc. (“Corpamerica”) and Middlesex Trading Corporation (“Middlesex”), brought this action against the defendants, R. Abbott and Minna Sinskey, husband and wife, charging them with conversion of corporate assets, usurpation of corporate opportunities and violations of Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b — 5 (1974), in connection with a series of bank acquisitions carried out by the defendants. The district court dismissed the Rule 10b-5 claim, but found that the defendants had breached…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- Federal United Corp. v. HavenderSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
- Bovay v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1944
- Johnston v. GreeneSupreme Court of Delaware · 1956
- Halpern v. BarranCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Rowen v. Le Mars Mut. Ins. Co. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Seidel v. LeeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1996
- Yiannatsis v. Stephanis Ex Rel. SterianouSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- CST, INC. v. MarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Jeffrey Norman v. David ElkinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.