Legal Opinion
Ayman v. Teachers' Retirement Board
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 13, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIrving H. Saypol, J.
These are two proceedings in which five petitioners personally and representatively ask for orders under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act compelling the respondent to perform its duties specifically enjoined by law.
The uncontroverted allegations in the petitions show that Ayman and Johnson are teachers in the Board of Education of the City of New York and thereby are members of the Teachers’ Retirement Association of the Teachers’ Retirement System, which is administered by the respondent. Johnson’s work began on September 7, 1917; the date of Ayman’s employment is not shown. Straus,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cash v. BatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Roddy v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Toscano v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Clark v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- People Ex Rel. Gas-Light Co. v. . Common CouncilNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Goss v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Haupt v. Teachers' Retirement BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Schacht v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Ayman v. Teachers' Retirement BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. KassNew York Supreme Court · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.