Ayman v. Teachers' Retirement Board

The proposed orders on both sides in both proceedings are improper in form and substance.

The petitioners’ orders contain improper decisional discussion in the proposed directory provisions. Counsel’s attention is directed to a revision of their proposed orders so as to eliminate all discussion and factual findings (Civ. Prac. Act, § 127; Rules Civ. Prac., rules 70-74; Carmody, New York Practice [Forkosch, 7th ed.], §§ 44, 45, 46; White v. White, 175 Misc. 66, 67).

The respondent’s proposed orders are at variance with the decision and opinion (Matter ofAymanY. Teachers’ Retirement Bd., 19 Mise…