Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Ford Motor Company

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1963No. Calendar 47, 48, Docket 49,732, 49,733PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

The 2 cases here consolidated for appeal arise out of the same factual background. Plaintiff in the first suit, Samuel Harrison, Jr., hereinafter called the plaintiff, was injured in the employ of Arthur G. McKee & Company on a con tract job being performed by tbe latter for Ford Motor Company, defendant in both suits. General Accident Assurance Corporation, hereinafter called the insurer, was the workmen’s compensation insurer of plaintiff’s employer, the McKee Company. It also insured Ford Motor Company against loss for injuries to plaintiff, if contributed to by the negligence of the McKee…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Muskegon Hardware & Supply Co. v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Sjoberg v. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  4. Tate v. TateTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Vernan v. GordonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kotarski v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1965
  2. Banoski v. Moto-Crane Service, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Hughes v. NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  4. Harris v. General Coach WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1964
  5. Tucker v. Clare Bros. Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API