Legal Opinion
Harris v. General Coach Works
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 15, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 24034PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TALBOT SMITH, District Judge.
The motion before us is that of the Great American Insurance Company, the compensation carrier of the plaintiff’s employer (Jimmie Harris, Inc.), to intervene in the action now pending between the employee, James W. Harris, plaintiff, and General Coach Works, the alleged tortfeasor, defendant. The plaintiff opposes the intervention.
The proposed intervenor seeks to intervene in this action because “(it) is the Workmen’s Compensation insurance carrier of the employer of the plaintiff, James W. Harris, the presentation of which by the plaintiff, James W. Harris, may…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Frank J. Kozak v. Willard B. Wells, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnny L. Southern, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellee v. Plumb Tools, a Division of O'Ames CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Shore v. Parklane Hosiery Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,121 Leo M. Shore v. Parklane Hosiery Company, Inc., Herbert N. Somekh v. Angelo C. Pappalardo, Intervening Stockholders-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Davila v. ArlaskyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Dubie v. Cass-Warner CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.