Legal Opinion

Banoski v. Moto-Crane Service, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 1971No. Docket 8927PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGregor, J.

Alex Banoski met with a compensable accident in the course of his employment with the Austin Company. General Accident Fire & Life Insurance Corporation, the workmen’s compensation carrier for the Austin Company, on its behalf, paid out the sum of $14,080 as a result of said injuries.

Alex Banoski and Marjorie Banoski, his wife, instituted a common-law negligence action against the alleged tortfeasors, Moto-Crane Service, Inc. and W. H. Anderson, Inc. Pursuant to a stipulation with the plaintiffs, General Accident Fire & Life Insurance intervened1 as a party plaintiff,2 seeking to recover the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Swift v. DodsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc. v. QuimbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Gamble v. American Asbestos Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Harrison v. Ford Motor CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Motyka v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Argonaut Insurance CompaniesAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Downie v. Kent ProductsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Kroll v. HYSTER COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Commercial Union Insurance v. BaioSuperior Court of Delaware · 1978
  5. Kroll v. HYSTER COMPANYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API