Legal Opinion

Sotelo v. Grant Township

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 2004No. Docket 123430PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs sought to divide their property in Grant Township, but the defendant township denied approval of the request pursuant to the Land Division Act (LDA), MCL 560.101 et seq. The circuit court upheld the township’s decision and awarded summary disposition for defendant. The Court of Appeals reversed. 255 Mich App 466; 660 NW2d 380 (2003). We reverse the Court of Appeals decision and reinstate the Newaygo Circuit Court judgment.

i

The LDA regulates the division of land by imposing platting (that is, mapping or charting) requirements and other building and assessment requirements. This case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Veenstra v. Washtenaw Country ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. First Public Corp. v. ParfetMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Wood v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Sotelo v. Grant TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Griffith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lash v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kevin Krohn v. Home-Owners Ins CoMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  4. People v. HoustonMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. YamatMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API