Legal Opinion

First Public Corp. v. Parfet

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 2003No. Docket 119204PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs seek leave to appeal a Court of Appeals judgment affirming the trial court’s grant of defendants’ motions for summary disposition. We affirm. However, because the Court of Appeals erred by recognizing an entirely new form of business entity not rooted in Michigan statutory or common law, we vacate in part its judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

At the heart of plaintiffs’ various claims alleging breaches of defendant’s fiduciary duties is whether plaintiff First Public Corporation and defendant Cale donia Group, Inc., formed a lawful business relationship, and, if so, whether that relationship…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Danse Corp. v. City of Madison HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Rose v. National Auction GroupMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hathaway v. Porter Royalty Pool, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Alderton v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Berger v. MeadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Quality Products and Concepts Co. v. Nagel Precision, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Schmalfeldt v. North Pointe InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. PT Today, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Office of Financial & Insurance ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Collins v. Comerica BankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re Rudell EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API