Legal Opinion

Sotelo v. Grant Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 2003No. Docket 238690PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBandstra, J.

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from the trial court’s opinion and order finding that plaintiffs’ division of property violated the Land Division Act (lda), MCL 560.101 et seq., and granting summary disposition in favor of defendant. We reverse and remand. This appeal is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).

FACTS

The facts underlying this appeal are not in dispute and were summarized by the trial court in its opinion:

Prior to July 15, 1999, the land involved in this dispute was divided into two adjacent parcels in the Township of Grant: Jeffrey and Susan Sotelo owned a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Danse Corp. v. City of Madison HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Rusinek v. Schultz, Snyder & Steele Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sotelo v. Grant TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API