Legal Opinion
Real Estate Mortgage Network, Inc. v. Squillante
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 28, 2018No. AC39229PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDiPENTIMA, C.J.
*358 The defendant Laura Squillante 1 appeals from an order of the trial court denying her motion to reopen a judgment of strict foreclosure. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court erred in denying her motion because, although it was filed approximately nine months after the applicable law day, title had not vested in the plaintiff, Real Estate Mortgage Network, Inc., and, thus, the court had jurisdiction to reopen the judgment of strict foreclosure. We do not agree.
The following uncontroverted facts are relevant to this appeal. On March 7, 2013, the plaintiff commenced an action…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Barclays Bank of New York v. IvlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. CharlesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- First National Bank of Chicago v. LueckenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Continental Capital Corp. v. LazarteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- U.S. Bank National Assn. v. Rothermel.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- Real Estate Mortg. Network, Inc. v. SquillanteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018