Legal Opinion

U.S. Bank National Assn. v. Rothermel.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 23, 2021No. SC20463PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE v. CAROL J. ROTHERMEL (SC 20463) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn and Ecker, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to statute (§ 49-15 (a) (1)), ‘‘[a]ny judgment foreclosing the title to real estate by strict foreclosure may, at the discretion of the court rendering the judgment, upon the written motion of any person having an interest in the judgment and for cause shown, be opened and modified . . . provided no such judgment shall be opened after the title has become absolute in any encumbrancer . . . .’’ The plaintiff bank sought to foreclose…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. In re Baby Girl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. TagerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelsey v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  2. Mercedes-Benz Financial v. 1188 Stratford Avenue, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
  3. Wahba v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API