Theisen v. Detroit Taxicab & Transfer Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Perkins, J.,' presiding. Case in justice’s court by John W. Theisen against the Detroit Taxicab & Transfer Company for damages to plaintiffs automobile. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
(after stating' the facts). The important questions presented on this record are the admissibility of the telephone conversation and its effect. Upon these questions the authorities are not in harmony. This court has already held that a telephone *139conversation is admissible where the identity of the persons communicated with by telephone is established. Harrison Granite Co. v. Railroad Co., 145 Mich. 712. The contention here goes further, and we are now called upon to determine the admissibility and effect of a telephone conversation conducted in the usual manner in the business world, by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Gardiner Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- Wolfe v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Western Union Tel. Co. v. RowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Union Constr. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Godair v. Ham National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Van Riper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Grinnell v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Atlantic Coast Realty Co. v. Robertson'sSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
- Bond Pharmacy, Inc. v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.