Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fisher v. State Farm General Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1999No. 98-353Published

1DissentJustice Hunt

*208¶22 I dissent from the majority opinion. I would hold that Fisher’s claim was not barred because the necessary elements of res judicata were not present.

¶23 On March 8,1995, Fisher filed a complaint against State Farm and its sales agent, Brian Taylor. Fisher requested contract damages for “the money owed under the insurance contract plus legal interest and costs”.

¶24 On March 14,1996, Fisher filed a second lawsuit against State Farm alleging the tort of wrongful claim handling; specifically that State Farm had violated the UCPA by failing to conduct a reasonable investigation before denying…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holtman v. 4-G's Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Brannon v. Lewis & Clark CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Scott v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re the Marriage of StoutMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Berlin v. BoedeckerMontana Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API