Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. Kidd

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1939No. Civ. No. 4090PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— The appellee in this case has filed a motion for rehearing. So far as the questions raised by this motion have been considered and determined by us in our original opinion, we see no reason to change our view of the law. There are, however, several questions raised by the motions in this and its companion cases (City of Phoenix v. R. D. Price, (Ariz.) 94 Pac. (2d) 433; City of Phoenix v. Arnold Enriquez, (Ariz.) 94 Pac. (2d) 434; City of Phoenix v. Harvey T. Wilson, (Ariz.) 94 Pac. (2d) 434), which were not suggested in the original briefs filed in this court and apparently were neither…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Munger v. BoardmanArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Tevis v. RyanArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Palmcroft Development Co. v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Palmcroft Development Co. v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Batterton v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Local Union No. 876, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. State Labor Mediation BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Parrack v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Yanke v. School District No. 65Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
  4. City of Phoenix v. EnriquezArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. City of Phoenix v. PriceArizona Supreme Court · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API