Legal Opinion

Parrack v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1959No. 6640PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

On September 30, 1958 this court, in an original proceeding, made permanent an alternative writ of mandamus requiring the officers of the City of Phoenix to pay salaries to employees of its fire department in accordance with Ordinance G-245 theretofore adopted by the City Council. See, Parrack v. City of Phoenix, 84 Ariz. 382, 329 P.2d 1103, and the earlier case of Williams v. Parrack, 83 Ariz. 227, 319 P.2d 989. A voluminous motion for rehearing, raising innumerable questions, was filed and, after oral argument, denied.

To date the firemen have received no benefits from the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Alabam's Freight Co. v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Mugford v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Building & Construction Trades CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. City of Tucson v. Tucson Sunshine Climate ClubArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  5. State Ex Rel. Pike v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Schryver v. SchirmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  3. O. G. Sansone Co. v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Town of Gila Bend v. Walled Lake Door CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Industrial Commission v. C & D Pipeline, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API