State v. Thomas
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROEB, Judge.
The issue presented in this case is whether certain time computations made by the Department of Corrections in regard to petitioner’s sentence constituted ex post facto applications of law in violation of the United States Constitution, Article 1, § 10, Clause 1, and the Arizona Constitution, Article 2, § 25. We find no such violation and deny the relief requested by petitioner.
Thomas was convicted in 1959 in Pinal County, Arizona, of grand theft, assault with intent to commit murder, and escape, and received three consecutive terms of imprisonment. He was eventually…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Michael L. Love v. C. J. Fitzharris, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, and the People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Enders v. Esquire Theaters of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. DeddensArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Mileham v. Arizona Board of Pardons and ParolesArizona Supreme Court · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ReffittArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- State v. StineCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Crumrine v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001