Legal Opinion

Doe v. Marten

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 2020No. A153427Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 6/4/20 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JANE DOE, Plaintiff and Appellant, A153427 v. TIMOTHY MARTEN et al., (City & County of San Francisco Super. Ct. Defendants and Respondents. No. CPF-11-511337) Plaintiff Jane Doe sued defendant Timothy Marten for damages sustained after he performed plastic surgery on her face and neck. At trial, the court granted defendant’s motion for nonsuit on plaintiff’s claim for medical battery, but submitted her medical malpractice claim to the jury. The jury…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API