Legal Opinion

InvestmentSignals v. Irrisoft

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided August 1, 2011No. 10-CV-600-SMPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

InvestmentSignals v . Irrisoft 10-CV-600-SM 8/1/11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE InvestmentSignals, LLC, Plaintiff v. Case N o . 10-cv-600-SM Opinion N o .

2011 DNH 124

Irrisoft, Inc., Defendant O R D E R The parties to this patent litigation are well-known to each other. For nearly a decade, InvestmentSignals has been asserting that Irrisoft infringes its patents, and both parties are intimately familiar with the two patents at issue here, the allegedly infringing products manufactured by Irrisoft, and Irrisoft’s defenses to the claimed infringement (i.e., non-…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. McZeal v. Sprint Nextel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  3. Tyco Fire Products LP v. Victaulic Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. The Salvation Army of Massachusetts Dorchester Day Care CenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  5. Pfizer Inc. v. Apotex Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States of America v. Sheikh Enamur Rahman a/k/a Mohammed EnamDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
  2. United States v. RahmanDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API