Legal Opinion
McZeal v. Sprint Nextel Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 14, 2007No. 19-1725PublishedCited by 349 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Senior Circuit Judge ARCHER. Concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part opinion filed by Circuit Judge DYK.
ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Alfred McZeal, Jr. (“McZeal”) appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. McZeal v. Sprint Nextel Corp., No. H-06-1775, 2006 WL 4792779 (S.D.Tex. June 20, 2006). Because McZeal met the minimal pleading requirements for his patent and trademark infringement claims, we vacate the district court’s dismissal of his complaint and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by349 opinions
- Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- R+L Carriers, Inc. v. DriverTech LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Reynolds v. CB Sports Bar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Nalco Company v. Chem-Mod, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- K-Tech Telecommunications, Inc. v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
344 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.