State ex rel. Olander v. French
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
Although the issue of privilege between state agencies and their in-house counsel is not before this court, our decision on whether to award Olander attorney fees is necessarily made in the context of that issue. Since we find that the OEPA and its counsel were reasonable in their position that OEPA’s communications with its in-house counsel were privileged, and because the public benefit gained by the success of Olander’s mandamus action was not significant enough to itself merit an award of attorney fees, we find that the court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in declining to award…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Warren Newspapers, Inc. v. HutsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Fox v. Cuyahoga County Hospital SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Multimedia Inc. v. SnowdenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Multimedia, Inc. v. WhalenOhio Supreme Court · 1990
3Cited by19 opinions
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Wadd v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Seneca County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Dillery v. IcsmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.