In re Estates of Beisel
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco settling the accounts of the mother of minor children in the matter of the guardianship of their estates. J. Y. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
After rehearing of this cause the opinion of Commissioner Vanclief, heretofore filed, is adopted as the opinion of the court down to paragraph 4, in place of which, and of the judgment of the department, the following is substituted:
4. Errors in the statement and settlement of respondent’s account have resulted from the manner in which the debts and credits of the two minors have been mingled with each other and with the account of Emma 1ST. Beisel. She is not formally a party to the proceeding, and the court does not appear to have acquired jurisdiction to make a decree binding…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alston v. AlstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- In re Estate of ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- In re the Final Account of BesondySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- In re De LeonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1804
- Osborne v. VanHornSupreme Court of Florida · 1848
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Guardianship of Di CarloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re Estate of BoyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Guardianship of JacobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Clanton v. CriteserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Gaskins v. Security-First National, BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.