Clanton v. Criteser
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. A. Anderson, A. G. Bailey, and G. Clark, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the superior court settling the final account of W. T. Criteser, as guardian of the estate of Samuel T. Clanton, an incompetent. After the death of the ward, the respondent presented his final account for settlement. The appellants, who are either heirs or assignees of heirs, filed a contest, which was heard and the court decided adversely to the contentions of the contestants.
Submitted with the appeal from the order is a motion to dismiss the said appeal upon the grounds and for the reasons that appellants failed to serve upon the administrator of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Redfield v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- In re the estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Rogers v. SchlotterbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Clary v. ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- In Re Guardianship of the Person & Estate of SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Guardianship of JacobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Gaskins v. Security-First National, BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Miller & Lux, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Riley v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Estate of SchluterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.