Legal Opinion

United States v. Tymond Preston

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 12, 2014No. 11-10511PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

Today we consider the voluntariness of a confession given by Tymond Preston, an intellectually disabled eighteen-year-old. To elicit this confession, the police, among other tactics, repeatedly presented Preston with the choice of confessing to a heinous crime or to a less heinous crime; rejected his denials of guilt; instructed him on the responses they would accept; and fed him the details of the crime to which they wanted him to confess. Under the totality of the circumstances, including Preston’s intellectual disability, we conclude that the confession that…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. United States v. James LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Terry Bemore v. Kevin ChappellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. State v. MetUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Eric Clark v. James ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Alexander Balbuena v. William SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API