Legal Opinion

Lickter v. Lickter

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 2010No. C061782PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROBIE, J.

The primary issue in this case is who is entitled to commence and/or maintain an elder abuse action after the elder who was allegedly abused has died. Generally, “the right to commence or maintain [such] an action . . . pass[es] to the personal representative of the decedent.” (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 15657.3, subd. (d)(1).) However, “[i]f the personal representative refuses to commence or maintain an action or if the personal representative’s family or an affiliate ... is alleged to have committed abuse of the elder” (italics added), then the Legislature has granted “standing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. White v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Property Reserve, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Joaquin CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Tepper v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. San Bernardino County Children & Family Services v. K.S.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Shaylin v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API