Legal Opinion
State v. Otness
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided August 13, 1999No. A-7028, A-7037, A-7038PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEWART, Judge.
When the legislature passed the Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act (ASORA),1 the legislature authorized the Department of Public Safety to adopt regulations implementing that act.2 Among the regulations adopted by the Department is a definition of “conviction” requiring registration of any person convicted of a sex offense even if the *891conviction was set aside after he or she successfully completed probation from a suspended imposition of sentence (SIS).3 Wendell Otness, Robert Elmore, and Neil F. Schenk all had their sex-offense convictions set aside after completing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State, Department of Revenue, Permanent Fund Dividend Division v. CosioAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Whaley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- Belarde v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
- State, Bd. of Marine Pilots v. RenwickAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Anchorage School District v. HaleAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Doe v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Holden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008
- State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002
- Bridge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.