Legal Opinion

Bridge v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided August 5, 2011No. A-10176PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

This appeal requires us to clarify the meaning of the term "correctional facility" for purposes of the second-degree escape statute, AS 11.56.8310. Under subsection (a)(1)(A) of this statute, a person commits the felony of second-degree escape if they unlawfully remove themselves "from a correctional facility" while they are under official detention for any crime, even a misdemeanor.

The term "correctional facility" is defined in AS 11.81.900(b)(9) as "premises ... used for the confinement of persons under official detention". The question posed in this appeal is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Rust v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Larson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
  4. State v. KalaolaHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. RosaireNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Medina v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2018
  2. Bridge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API