Legal Opinion

Juedell T. Lawrence v. Virginia Insurance Reciprocal

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1992No. 91-7057PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:

For the most part, this appeal turns on whether an insurer, which did not defend an underlying action against its insured, is therefore estopped from asserting sovereign immunity in defending against a garnishment by the plaintiff from the prior action. Juedell T. Lawrence appeals from a summary judgment granted Virginia Insurance Reciprocal (VIR) on her garnishment action to collect punitive and mental anguish damages awarded her in a state court action against VIR’s insured, Southwest Mississippi Regional Medical Center (Southwest). Because VIR is not estopped, we…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. Moore v. MolpusMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co. v. PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Universal Life Ins. Co. v. VeasleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Myron Batts v. Tow-Motor Forklift Company and Caterpillar, Inc., Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Centennial Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Counter v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., Defendant-Counter Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. C.P. Interests, Inc. v. California Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Convalescent Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  5. Westport Insurance v. Atchley, Russell, Waldrop & Hlavinka, L.L.P.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API