St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Convalescent Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:
This appeal involves the scope of an insurer’s duty to its insured in the context of settlement negotiations under- Texas law. Concluding that the Texas Supreme Court would not impose a duty upon an insurer to take into consideration a claim specifically excluded from coverage, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (St.Paul) filed a complaint for declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 in federal district court, seeking a determination that it was not liable- for payment of a punitive damages award entered against its insured,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- G. A. Stowers Furniture Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
- American Physicians Insurance Exchange v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation v. Transportation Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Howe v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Westchester Fire Insurance Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- United Teacher Associates Insurance Co. v. Union Labor Life Insurance Company, Union Standard of America Life Insurance Co., United Teacher Associates Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Counter v. Union Labor Life Insurance Company, Union Standard of America Life Insurance Co., Defendants-Counter Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Ford v. Cimarron Ins Co IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Brittan Communications International Corp. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.