Legal Opinion

Ace Beverage Co. v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1993No. B070395PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS (Fred), J.

Petitioners contend that after trials on parking infractions, the court erred because it refused to settle statements on appeal with relevant pleadings and factual evidence. As we conclude that the court should have included the issue of the right to a speedy trial, the petition for a writ of mandate is granted.

Factual and Procedural Synopsis

Petitioners are defendants in two parking infraction actions in municipal court. The matters were originally set for trial on January 13, 1992. At that time, defendants made written motions to dismiss on the grounds that the matters…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Lemelle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Star Motor Imports, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Averill v. LincolnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Superior Court of Tulare CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Richardson v. Superior Court of Tulare CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API