Legal Opinion
State v. Chrisicos
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 25, 2002No. 2001-516PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The defendant, William R. Chrisicos, appeals his conviction of driving while under the influence of liquor. See RSA 265:82 (Supp. 2002). He argues that the Nashua District Court (Huot, J.) erroneously denied his motion to suppress statements he made during the booking process. We reverse and remand.
On May 31, 2001, an officer of the Nashua Police Department responded to the scene of an auto accident. Two ambulance attendants were treating a laceration on the defendant’s head, and when the officer spoke with him, he noted a strong odor of alcohol on the defendant’s breath. The officer…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Commonwealth v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- State v. GullickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. PlchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. RheaumeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- State of New Hampshire v. David PylesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014