Legal Opinion
State v. Plch
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 30, 2003No. 2000-789PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.
The defendant, Vaclav Plch, appeals his first-degree murder conviction, arguing that the Trial Court (Groff, J.) erred in: (1) failing to suppress statements he made during custodial interrogation and after his invocation of the right to counsel; (2) finding that he was adequately informed of his right to have counsel present while being questioned; (3) *610failing to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a warrant supported by-observations made in a prior illegal search; and (4) limiting evidence that the victim had used prescription medication. We affirm.
We recite the following facts as found by…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. GossSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. AyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- State v. KousounadisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. OrdeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. GribbleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.