State of New Hampshire v. David Pyles
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The defendant, David Pyles, appeals his convictions, following a jury trial in Superior Court {McHugh, J.), on three counts of pattern aggravated felonious sexual assault, see RSA 632-A:2, III (2007), arguing that the Trial Court {Mohl, J.) erred in denying his motion to suppress statements allegedly obtained in violation of his Miranda rights. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). We affirm.
We recite the facts as stated in the trial court’s order on the motion to suppress or as supported by the record. On January 14, 2010, Detective Michael Bernard of the Salem Police Department…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Commonwealth v. GaulSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Brian WatsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- State v. Brian WatsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018