Legal Opinion

Goad v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1996No. 01S01-9509-CR-00169PublishedCited by 2,165 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

The primary issue in this appeal is whether the petitioner, William Wesley Goad, was afforded his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel at the sentencing phase of his capital trial.

The Tennessee death penalty statute, Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-2-203, requires at the sentencing phase of a capital trial that the jury weigh statutory aggravating circumstances against statutory and other mitigating circumstances. If the mitigating circumstances do not outweigh the aggravating circumstances 1 , the jury must return the death penalty.

In this case, the State…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Baxter v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Hellard v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
  5. California v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,165 opinions

  1. State v. BurnsTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Henley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Vaughn v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  4. House v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Grindstaff v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2009

2,160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API