Legal Opinion

California v. Brown

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 27, 1987No. 85-1563PublishedCited by 1,101 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist

The question presented for review in this case is whether an instruction informing jurors that they “must not be swayed by mere sentiment, conjecture, sympathy, passion, prejudice, public opinion or public feeling” during the penalty phase of a capital murder trial violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. We hold that it does not.

Respondent Albert Brown was found guilty by a jury of forcible rape and first-degree murder in the death of 15-year-old Susan J. At the penalty phase, the State presented evidence that respondent had raped another young girl…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,101 opinions

  1. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Goad v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Henley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

1,096 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API