House v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court 1
*511OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · HolderJanice M. Holder, J.
E. RILEY ANDERSON, C.J., and FRANK F. DROWOTA, III and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., joined.
We granted review in this post-conviction case to determine whether a petitioner has a right to disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant for the purpose of mounting a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based upon trial counsel’s failure to seek disclosure. The post-conviction court concluded that counsel’s representation in this regard was not deficient and quashed the petitioner’s subpoena for attendance of the informant at the eviden-tiary hearing. The Court of Criminal Appeals…
3Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Baxter v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. BurnsTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by455 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- Howell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. OsteinTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Schneider v. City of JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Dean v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
450 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.